The name's Saan. This is a personal blog, as well as a Supernatural blog. My favorites are the angels. I love Sam, tho, too. I also post Rooster Teeth, Flight Rising, and Minecraft, though that is few and far between.



cutiegabriel:

Booty bootyyy bOOTAYY ԅ(≖‿≖ԅ)
 Sep 2nd -  108 notes - Reblog  - via / source

SPN Fans: I don’t like Gabriel.
Me: Cool beans.

Me: I don’t like Dean.
World explodes.

 Sep 2nd -  2 notes - Reblog

Shout out to jaydubfilm, who’s still following me—probably for The Portal stuff I keep rebloggin’ from them—and has to put up with everything that’s not related to their interests.

 Sep 2nd -  0 notes - Reblog
 spersonal;  

Oh, and, if y’all keep saying, “The show’s about family~” and forgetting that there were actually three fuckin’ brothers… I’m going to snap.

 Sep 2nd -  1 notes - Reblog

"The show is about two brothers. Nothing else matters," is a sure fire way to make me want to toss you into a ditch.

Because that’s not how you tell a story. That’s not how some of your audience is going to view your story. They’re going to take away from your story more things than you think they will. To focus only on two people and toss everyone else aside, as if they have no point, is to reduce those two characters.

I think Kim Rhodes alluded to that, once. Yeah, there’s Sam and there’s Dean. Great. But without the relationships they make with other characters? Without other characters to help them grow?

The world stagnates with just Sam and Dean.

Oh, and if someone likes the side characters? Perhaps they like them more than the main characters? They’re allowed to. Because, most likely, those side characters click with them better. Remind them of something, someone, or themselves.

You better not shit on them for that. They’re not ‘watching the show wrong.’ They’re partaking in a story and coming up with their own interpretation, their own moral, which is something the creative world keeps saying is the best way to do it…

 Sep 2nd -  3 notes - Reblog

"You can not love one brother and not the other. You can’t."

HAHAHA, WATCH ME. Fucking watch me. I don’t have to like someone just because I like their fucking sibling. I don’t have to like members of my family just because they’re my family. And, no, I’m not going to stop associating with one person because I can’t fuckin’ stand the person they’re around.

 Sep 2nd -  2 notes - Reblog
 Sep 2nd -  375 notes - Reblog  - via / source
why do black people use you in the wrong context? such is "you ugly" instead of "you're ugly" I know u guys can differentiate, it's a nuisance

Anonymous

rsbenedict:

prettyboyshyflizzy:

you a bitch

It’s called copula deletion, or zero copula. Many languages and dialects, including Ancient Greek and Russian, delete the copula (the verb to be) when the context is obvious.

So an utterance like “you a bitch” in AAVE is not an example of a misused you, but an example of a sentence that deletes the copular verb (are), which is a perfectly valid thing to do in that dialect, just as deleting an /r/ after a vowel is a perfectly valid thing to do in an upper-class British dialect.

 Sep 2nd -  65726 notes - Reblog  - via / source

No, seriously…

Why?

And don’t even get me started on how long it took me to find a site that told me how those clothes fuckin worked.

 Sep 2nd -  0 notes - Reblog
 spersonal;  

"What should I make Gabe wear? Oh! I know! What’s those clothes those winged, Assyrian gods wore?"

Ha ha haaaa. >:[

 Sep 2nd -  1 notes - Reblog
© JASONDILAURENTS